← Muchangi Patrick Published Work
⇩ Download PDF
Muchangi Patrick & Co. Advocates logo Muchangi Patrick & Co. Advocates ← Back to the Blog

Case Note

Case Notes & Commentary
ODPC & High Court, Kenya
One ruling, digested on its own — the facts, the holding, and the practice point
[2026] KEHC 9467

Vicarious liability holds — but so does proportionality

Premier Credit Ltd v Office of the Data Protection Commissioner & Another

Partly allowed Case Note Data Protection · Administrative Law
By the Editorial Board, Muchangi Patrick & Co. Advocates

Independent sales agents kept texting a woman who had formally asked to be removed from marketing lists, despite the lender's denial that her number was even in its system. The Court affirmed liability: agents acting within the scope of their delegated authority make the principal vicariously liable, and a lender that fails to produce its actual agency agreements can't complain when adverse inferences are drawn against it. But the Court also revised the KES 650,000 award down to KES 200,000, reasoning that an award pitched at a level that risks forcing closure of a smaller lender is punitive rather than compensatory, and out of step with prevailing economic conditions.

Practice pointVicarious liability for agents is now settled law under the Act — but so is the principle that compensation must be evidence-based and proportionate to the size of the respondent, not maximalist by default.
Cite this page: Muchangi Patrick & Co. Advocates, "Vicarious liability holds — but so does proportionality: Premier Credit Ltd v Office of the Data Protection Commissioner & Another" (dataprivacyadvocates.co.ke, 2026) <https://dataprivacyadvocates.co.ke/case-premier-credit-ltd-v-office-of-the-data-protecti.html>.
How this touches a live ODPC matter

Whether you are defending a complaint, appealing a determination, or bringing a privacy claim of your own, the forum you choose and the procedural record you build early usually decide the outcome.

Muchangi Patrick & Co. Advocates represents complainants and respondents before the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner and on appeal, judicial review and constitutional petition before the High Court.

Continue reading
← Recording evidence isn't thrown out on a Data Protection Act objection at the preliminary stage
All Case Notes on the Blog
A recycled phone number doesn't make the new owner a data subject of the old customer's data →